• 6 hours Oil Drops, Markets Rattle as Trump Unleashes Tariffs
  • 10 hours Oil Holds Steady as Market Prepares to Panic over ‘Liberation Day’
  • 12 hours ConocoPhillips Considers Selling Prime Oklahoma Assets
  • 13 hours U.S. Energy Department Re-Launches Voluntary Staff Exit Program
  • 14 hours Russia Expands Halts to Oil Export Capacity in the Black Sea
  • 15 hours OPEC+ Energy Ministers to Discuss Production Quota Compliance
  • 16 hours India Hikes U.S. Crude Oil Imports by 67% in March
  • 17 hours U.S. Senators Plan 500% Tariff on Russian Energy Buyers If Peace Talks Stall
  • 18 hours India Power Utility Seeks Partners for Nuclear
  • 20 hours Thailand Pledges to Buy More Energy From the U.S.
  • 21 hours U.S. Sanctions Push Venezuelan Oil Exports Down
  • 22 hours Kazakh CPC Oil Exports to Drop by 700,000 bpd After Russian Suspension
  • 1 day Crude Oil Inventories Climb As OPEC Prepares to Open the Tap
  • 1 day OPEC Cuts Oil Production in March, Ahead of Ramp Up Plans
  • 2 days OPEC+ To Increase Oil Production in May: Report
  • 2 days Russian Arctic LNG 2 Project Resumes Gas Processing
  • 2 days Kazakhstan Keeps Exceeding OPEC+ Quota With Record-High Oil Production
  • 2 days Oil Prices Flat As OPEC+ Starts Easing Production Cuts
  • 2 days Russia Halts Large Chunk of Kazakhstan’s Oil Export Capacity
  • 2 days Higher Oil Trading Volumes Boost Gunvor’s Revenue to $136 Billion
  • 2 days Tokyo Gas Buys 70% in Chevron’s Haynesville Natural Gas Assets
  • 2 days Indian Refiners Seek Alternatives to Russian Crude After Trump Tariff Threat
  • 2 days Oil Majors Warn That Australia’s Natural Gas Policy Could Make Shortages Worse
  • 2 days Vietnam Cuts Import Tariffs in Response to Trump’s Push
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Output Drops to Lowest Level in 15 Months
  • 2 days Equinor’s Giant New Arctic Find Starts Pumping to Recoup $8B in 2 Years
  • 3 days Vitol-Carlyle Group Buys Swedish Refiner to Boost Biofuels Business
  • 3 days South Africa Allows Some Coal Plants to Top Emissions Limits
  • 3 days Equinor Starts Up Arctic Oilfield Johan Castberg
  • 3 days Analysts Don’t See Too Much Upside for Oil Prices
  • 3 days Norway’s Oil Fund to Buy Stakes in Offshore Wind for $1.5 Billion
  • 3 days U.S. Scraps Foreign Firms’ Licenses to Operate in Venezuela’s Oil Industry
  • 3 days North Sea Taskforce Urges Windfall Tax Replacement Before 2030
  • 3 days Trump Threatens Iran With Bombs If Nuclear Deal Fails
  • 3 days Chinese Oil Major Discovers New Field
  • 3 days Trump Threatens Russia With Further Oil Sanctions
  • 5 days Toothless EU Re-Export Ban on Russian LNG Kicks In
  • 6 days Europe’s LNG Imports Hit Seasonal High
  • 6 days Russia’s Far East Crude Price Slumps as China’s State Refiners Cut Imports
  • 6 days Saudi Arabia Set to Slash Oil Prices to Asia Amid Falling Benchmarks
Robert Rapier

Robert Rapier

Robert Rapier is a chemical engineer in the energy industry. He has 25 years of international engineering experience in the chemical, oil and gas, and…

More Info

Premium Content

Capital Costs Pose Major Risk to LNG Investments

  • New LNG projects on the U.S. Gulf and East Coasts face substantial risks due to unpredictable capital costs, labor shortages, and long project timelines that coincide with uncertain market demand.
  • The reliance of U.S. natural gas production on associated gas from oil wells makes the LNG export market vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices and potential domestic supply constraints.
  • Global competition from LNG projects in Canada, Mexico, Alaska, and other regions, along with evolving energy policies in Europe and Asia, creates significant uncertainty for the long-term viability of U.S. LNG expansion.
Natural Gas

Major long-term capital investments require predictable profitability and stable capital costs. For the eight large-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects proposed on the U.S. Gulf and East Coasts, both of these factors appear increasingly uncertain.

Capital Cost Uncertainty and Workforce Challenges

One of the biggest risks for these projects is unpredictable capital costs. The Biden administration and President Donald Trump have imposed tariffs on steel and critical energy infrastructure components, but future tariff rates remain uncertain. LNG facilities require specialty materials, such as high-cost cryogenic steel, which could be subject to tariffs of 25%, 50%, or even higher. This could significantly increase construction costs.

Another challenge is labor availability. Building large LNG facilities requires a substantial skilled workforce willing to relocate. With multiple ongoing projects and a limited labor pool, competition for workers will drive up wages and could lead to project delays.

Long Project Timelines and Market Uncertainty

LNG projects typically take five years to complete after a Final Investment Decision (FID), meaning that investments today must forecast profitability starting around 2030. While permitting under the Trump administration may not be an issue, global LNG supply and demand from 2030 to 2045 remain uncertain.

Unlike many global LNG projects that rely on stranded natural gas with little domestic competition, U.S. LNG exports depend on a vast but historically volatile internal market. The Gulf and East Coast LNG sites also face hurricane risks, which could lead to long-term force majeure events and rising insurance costs.

The Role of Associated Gas and Future Supply Constraints

The U.S. natural gas market relies heavily on associated gas production from oil wells. Currently, about 25% of U.S. natural gas production comes from fracked oil wells in the Permian (20%), Bakken (3%), and Eagle Ford (5.5%) basins. Unlike conventional gas fields, where production declines slowly, fracked wells see rapid declines after just a few years.

If oil drilling slows due to falling global prices, U.S. natural gas production could drop sharply. If this coincides with increased domestic gas demand for power generation, LNG exports may face restrictions to protect U.S. energy security. A future administration could impose limits on LNG exports rather than allowing market forces to dictate supply and demand.

Geopolitical Risks and the U.S. as an Unreliable Supplier

Foreign buyers of LNG must also consider geopolitical risks. The United States has recently demonstrated a willingness to disrupt trade agreements. Given the scale of U.S. LNG exports, foreign buyers may choose to avoid over-reliance on a single, potentially unpredictable supplier.

Canada is already shifting its ~8 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) of gas exports from the U.S. to LNG exports aimed at East Asia. This will further tighten the U.S. domestic market, potentially impacting prices for U.S. Gulf and East Coast LNG projects.

Meanwhile, Mexico is increasing its natural gas pipeline imports from the U.S., both for domestic use and for LNG exports via its own Pacific Coast LNG projects. A 2 bcf/d pipeline from the Permian Basin is nearing FID, with another 2 bcf/d pipeline planned. This could create additional competition for U.S. Gulf Coast projects in the Asia-Pacific LNG market.

Global Competition

LNG from the U.S. Gulf and East Coasts faces intense competition from other global projects:

Canada’s Pacific Coast: A 5 bcf/d pipeline serving a 1.85 bcf/d LNG plant in British Columbia is set to start operations this year, with a second 1.85 bcf/d phase planned. A smaller LNG facility near Vancouver is already under construction.

Mexico’s Pacific Coast: A major LNG plant sourcing gas from the Permian Basin is under development. More LNG facilities could be built after 2030.

Alaska’s LNG Projects: Former President Trump is pushing a $44 billion LNG project on Alaska’s southern coast. If Japan and other Asian buyers commit, 3.1 bcf/d could come online well before 2045.

Guyana, West Africa, and the Mediterranean: These regions are developing LNG projects that could compete with U.S. exports to the Atlantic Basin.

Pipeline Alternatives to Europe: The EU’s reliance on LNG could decline if Russian pipelines are reactivated or if new supplies from Iraq, Iran, or Turkmenistan become available.

The LNG Market in Europe and Asia

The European Union and the UK remain committed to reducing carbon emissions, which may put pressure on long-term natural gas demand. While LNG remains critical for energy security, renewables and hydrogen are projected to displace natural gas over time.

In Asia, the market remains in flux. Russia is pushing the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline to China, although China is demanding steep discounts. Meanwhile, Turkmenistan is debating whether to sell more gas east to China or west to the EU. Australia continues to modestly expand its LNG export capacity, providing stable competition.

Critically, LNG projects in Canada, Mexico, and Alaska can serve Asian markets more efficiently than Gulf and East Coast projects. They benefit from shorter shipping distances, lower costs, and no reliance on the increasingly expensive and congested Panama Canal. Additionally, Gulf and East Coast LNG projects face hurricane risks that could disrupt operations for months or even years.

Investment Risks and Long-Term Viability

Given these uncertainties, the massive U.S. LNG expansion proposed may face a smaller and more competitive market than anticipated. Some financial risks can be mitigated through long-term contracts, but they cannot be eliminated entirely.

Prospective investors will need to carefully weigh the potential for cost overruns, supply chain disruptions, and global competition. While LNG demand is expected to remain strong in the near term, the landscape beyond 2030 presents significant challenges for Gulf and East Coast projects.

By Robert Rapier

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today
Download Oilprice.com on Apple Download Oilprice.com on Android

Back to homepage



ADVERTISEMENT



Leave a comment

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News